There is now considerable evidence that male reproductive function is declining in human and wildlife populations.
This is coincident with the increasing use and prevalence of man-made chemicals in the environment over the last fifty years.
Certain chemicals have subsequently been shown to disturb the developing fetal endocrine system of laboratory animals in utero.
In these experiments, treatment caused similar male reproductive problems in offspring as those already observed in wildlife and human populations.
In addition, both the human DES data and rodent studies have shown that there are specific windows of gestation when the developing fetal gonad is highly sensitive to small endocrine changes.
Animal in vivo and human in vitro studies have identified EDC sensitive genes. Consequently, hypotheses are being generated concerning mechanism of action e.g. disturbed testicular apoptosis and altered hepatic biotransformation of steroids.
While animal studies provide us with valuable insights into the range of effects that can be attributed to in utero EDC exposure, varying maternal doses employed by different research groups make relation of the results to human observations difficult.
The EDC concentration representative of fetal exposure levels is uncertain. Confounding factors include: (a) the vast number of chemicals termed EDCs, (b) the ability of chemicals to bioaccumulate in body lipid, (c) the metabolism of body lipid during pregnancy releasing the mothers lifetime EDC legacy into circulation and (d) the poorly understood kinetics of EDC transfer across the placenta.
Thus, the level of fetal exposure can only be crudely estimated at present. This highlights the need for large animal models of EDC in utero exposure where the partitioning of EDCs between the mother and fetus and transfer across the placenta can be studied in detail.
Despite considerable effort the mechanisms by which these endocrine disrupting chemicals exert their effects are still largely unknown.
Further studies of the mechanism of action, and consequences, of EDCs in fetal development must be done in order to elucidate how EDCs exert their effects.
This can only be achieved using a combined approach whereby animal models are used in combination with in vitro human studies.
In conclusion however, there are now sufficient animal model data to prove that EDCs can adversely affect reproductive development and function in the male.
Our further understanding of the mechanisms involved may allow intervention strategies whereby we can at least prevent a further decline in male as well as female reproductive health.
References
- Environmental Effects on Reproductive Health: The Endocrine Disruption Hypothesis
By Dore Hollander
Family Planning Perspectives
Volume 29, Number 2, March/April 1997
- Persistent DDT metabolite p,p'-DDE is a potent androgen receptor antagonist.
Kelce WR and et al
Nature. 1995 Jun 15;375(6532):581-5.
- The PBDEs: an emerging environmental challenge and another reason for breast-milk monitoring programs.
Hooper K1, McDonald TA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2000 May;108(5):387-92.
- Endocrine disrupting chemicals: effects on human male reproductive health.
Murray TJ and et al
Early Pregnancy. 2001 Apr;5(2):80-112.
- Putative effects of endocrine disrupters on pubertal development in the human.
Teilmann G and et al
Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2002 Mar;16(1):105-21.
- Lessons from the polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs): precautionary principle,
primary prevention, and
the value of community-based body-burden monitoring using
breast milk.
Hooper K1, She J.
Environmental Health Perspectives. 2003 Jan;111(1):109-14.
- Polybrominated diphenyl ethers in the environment and in people: a meta-analysis of concentrations.
Hites RA1.
Environmental Science & Technology. 2004 Feb 15;38(4):945-56.
- Health risks and benefits of bis(4-chlorophenyl)-1,1,1-trichloroethane (DDT).
Rogan WJ1, Chen A.
Lancet. 2005 Aug 27-Sep 2;366(9487):763-73.
- Early onset of puberty: tracking genetic and environmental factors.
Parent AS and et al
Hormone Research. 2005;64 Suppl 2:41-7.
- Noise Pollution: A Modern Plague
Lisa Goines, RN; Louis Hagler, MD
Southern Medical Journal 2007;100(3):287-294.
- Endocrine disruptors and abnormalities of pubertal development.
Schoeters G and et al
Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology. 2008 Feb;102(2):168-75.
- Human exposure to endocrine disruptors and breast milk.
Stefanidou M and et al
Endocrine Metabolic & Immune Disorders Drug Targets. 2009 Sep;9(3):269-76.
- Study Links Water Pollution with Declining Male Fertility
Brunel university 19 Jan 2009
- Hypothesis: exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals may interfere with timing of puberty.
Mouritsen A and et al
International Journal of Andrology. 2010 Apr;33(2):346-59.
- Effect of noise stress on count, progressive and non-progressive sperm motility, body and genital organ weights of adult male rats
Maryam Jalali
Journal of Human Reproductive Science 2012
- 4-Nonylphenol and bisphenol A in Swedish food and exposure in Swedish
nursing women.
Gyllenhammar I and et al
Environment International. 2012 Aug;43:21-8.
- Association between Endocrine Disrupting Phenols in Colostrums and Maternal and
Infant Health.
Yi B and et al
International Journal of Endocrinology. 2013;2013:282381.
- Exposure to high pollution levels during pregnancy may increase risk of having
child with autism
Andrea Roberts and et al
Environmental Health Perspectives. June 18, 2013
- Current understandings and perspectives on non-cancer health effects of benzene:
a global concern.
Bahadar H and et al
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2014 Apr 15;276(2):83-94
- A review of environmental and occupational exposure to xylene and its health concerns.
Niaz K and et a
EXCLI Journal. 2015 Nov 23;14:1167-86.
- Biodetection of potential genotoxic pollutants entering the human food chain through
ashes used in livestock diets.
Sanchez-Vicente L and at al
Food Chem. 2016 Aug 15;205:81-8.